covid's relation to monkey pox?
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2022 8:19 pm
any truth or rumor?
Kratom forum, reviews, and vendor listings
https://mail.doublemherbals.com/
Look into the World Economic Forum and Klaus Schwab, agenda 2030. it's no secret, they openly state it. "You will own nothing and be happy". They're very much into "population control"IndelibleDotInk wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 9:40 pm or i dunno... am tired. Is a one world government such a bad thing? I guess if it entails mass killing, it does.
Look into Bill Gates and his father. They are straight up eugenisists. They dont hid it. And yes there is a much bigger agenda here. Its very slow moving but its moving. Thanks for you're post.CatfatherB wrote: ↑Sun Aug 14, 2022 11:02 amLook into the World Economic Forum and Klaus Schwab, agenda 2030. it's no secret, they openly state it. "You will own nothing and be happy". They're very much into "population control"IndelibleDotInk wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 9:40 pm or i dunno... am tired. Is a one world government such a bad thing? I guess if it entails mass killing, it does.
Where do you get your information from if you dont mind me asking?iamlurkerpro wrote: ↑Tue Aug 16, 2022 4:30 pm I think the people that believe these conspiracy theories are way worse for the population than almost anything else. Monkey pox has been around for a long time, and has been raging in several African countries for years now. The US had like 20 million doses of the vaccine for it they let expire instead of giving to the countries with outbreaks. with world travel so easy anymore diseases will spread, and with people who think vaccines have direct connections to a NSA satellite putting out crazy theories in which a portion of humans want to believe be true wont take them, they will continue to spread. Monkeypox is not new and many other things that will continue to infect humans, it has been that way since the beginning. Vaccines have done so much to help humanity, that when an outbreak does happen there are surprised and scared and think the boogyman is trying to get them.
iamlurkerpro wrote: ↑Wed Aug 17, 2022 3:21 pm A fairly large varity of places, NPR,BBC, Ny Times, and so many other's. I do not get any from Fox,facebook,youtube. It like in science, you hear a theory and read it, then find peer reviewed articles either proving or disproving.
The funny thing is is that all of the major news we are fed....and yes they try to feed us the Bs, is all owned by 6 people who in turn are owned by either blackrock or vanguard (like everything else). I dont trust anything on any major tv networks. I think a lot of whats pumped out is meant to seperate us and cause divide. I read a lot of articles from accredited dr's, scientists, and people who were very esteemed by everyone until covid hit and they were discredited pretty quickly. We should be able to read both sides and make a decision for ourselves, but in this mess a lot of info was censored. That to me means there is something to hide. Again my opinion. Take care brother!iamlurkerpro wrote: ↑Wed Aug 17, 2022 3:21 pm A fairly large varity of places, NPR,BBC, Ny Times, and so many other's. I do not get any from Fox,facebook,youtube. It like in science, you hear a theory and read it, then find peer reviewed articles either proving or disproving. Like with Fox, almost 100% of their stories are only backed by the alex jones type outlet's, and most every other outlet in the world calls bs, so you can figure out the story is poo. Same goes with every outlet really, just fox being the worst, cnn has a story search for it and see if the other sources prove or disprove. Another great thing to do is if someone says "they researched" it themselves, most likely its total BS and at best its a 1/10 truth mixed with BS. Most news outlets only care about money, so if there is a story with validity they will all run it into the ground and try to get every penny out of it. Only watching/reading one or two places isnt good anymore,try as many as you can.
In the Us 6 corporations do own over 90% of the media, thats why NPR and BBC are such great resources. NPR is kinda self funded(they dont get anything from the Gov) and BBC runs off a tax on cable in england and abroad, so they really are not beholden to corp boards. That does go back to the 6 are 100% in it for profit. If there was any( and I mean any) chance the Gov was lying about covid they would go balls out to squeeze every penny out of exposing them. Blackrock and vanguard are not in the 6 Corp's that own 90% of the media companies in the US. Also the "Dr's" you referred to articles were probably not peer reviewed and thats why they were discredited. Its like commercials for toothpaste where they say 9 out of 10 doctors recommend this, theres always some that go against the grain,but that doesnt mean they are correct. In science if 9 out of 10 say the peer reviewed info to be correct, then as close to 100% as you can get that the 1 is wrong.Roofdog wrote: ↑Wed Aug 17, 2022 4:13 pmThe funny thing is is that all of the major news we are fed....and yes they try to feed us the Bs, is all owned by 6 people who in turn are owned by either blackrock or vanguard (like everything else). I dont trust anything on any major tv networks. I think a lot of whats pumped out is meant to seperate us and cause divide. I read a lot of articles from accredited dr's, scientists, and people who were very esteemed by everyone until covid hit and they were discredited pretty quickly. We should be able to read both sides and make a decision for ourselves, but in this mess a lot of info was censored. That to me means there is something to hide. Again my opinion. Take care brother!iamlurkerpro wrote: ↑Wed Aug 17, 2022 3:21 pm A fairly large varity of places, NPR,BBC, Ny Times, and so many other's. I do not get any from Fox,facebook,youtube. It like in science, you hear a theory and read it, then find peer reviewed articles either proving or disproving. Like with Fox, almost 100% of their stories are only backed by the alex jones type outlet's, and most every other outlet in the world calls bs, so you can figure out the story is poo. Same goes with every outlet really, just fox being the worst, cnn has a story search for it and see if the other sources prove or disprove. Another great thing to do is if someone says "they researched" it themselves, most likely its total BS and at best its a 1/10 truth mixed with BS. Most news outlets only care about money, so if there is a story with validity they will all run it into the ground and try to get every penny out of it. Only watching/reading one or two places isnt good anymore,try as many as you can.
I have to disagree with your comment to Blackrock and Vanguard. They own just about everything. Just about all world money flows through these 2 companies. There was a chart done a while back showing how just about all money flows back to these 2. They own the companies that own the companies ect. Ect. For example, you buy coke or pepsi the money flows back to 1 of these 2. Its like that across the board. As far as the dr's and scientists go I am talking about the ones who have received rewards from the cdc, who, wef ect. Then once they spoke out these very organizations banned and discredited them. I dont believe anyone should be banned from any SM site. We should be able to recieve all information and make our own decisions. We aren't little kids we are intelligent adults that make life changing decisions everyday for our families. Just saw some headlines yesterday that the cdc is admitting they handled the pandemic incorrectly, i havent looked into this yet but i will over the weekend and see who said what. Thats pretty interesting. Good conversation thanks for engaging!!iamlurkerpro wrote: ↑Wed Aug 17, 2022 7:10 pmIn the Us 6 corporations do own over 90% of the media, thats why NPR and BBC are such great resources. NPR is kinda self funded(they dont get anything from the Gov) and BBC runs off a tax on cable in england and abroad, so they really are not beholden to corp boards. That does go back to the 6 are 100% in it for profit. If there was any( and I mean any) chance the Gov was lying about covid they would go balls out to squeeze every penny out of exposing them. Blackrock and vanguard are not in the 6 Corp's that own 90% of the media companies in the US. Also the "Dr's" you referred to articles were probably not peer reviewed and thats why they were discredited. Its like commercials for toothpaste where they say 9 out of 10 doctors recommend this, theres always some that go against the grain,but that doesnt mean they are correct. In science if 9 out of 10 say the peer reviewed info to be correct, then as close to 100% as you can get that the 1 is wrong.Roofdog wrote: ↑Wed Aug 17, 2022 4:13 pmThe funny thing is is that all of the major news we are fed....and yes they try to feed us the Bs, is all owned by 6 people who in turn are owned by either blackrock or vanguard (like everything else). I dont trust anything on any major tv networks. I think a lot of whats pumped out is meant to seperate us and cause divide. I read a lot of articles from accredited dr's, scientists, and people who were very esteemed by everyone until covid hit and they were discredited pretty quickly. We should be able to read both sides and make a decision for ourselves, but in this mess a lot of info was censored. That to me means there is something to hide. Again my opinion. Take care brother!iamlurkerpro wrote: ↑Wed Aug 17, 2022 3:21 pm A fairly large varity of places, NPR,BBC, Ny Times, and so many other's. I do not get any from Fox,facebook,youtube. It like in science, you hear a theory and read it, then find peer reviewed articles either proving or disproving. Like with Fox, almost 100% of their stories are only backed by the alex jones type outlet's, and most every other outlet in the world calls bs, so you can figure out the story is poo. Same goes with every outlet really, just fox being the worst, cnn has a story search for it and see if the other sources prove or disprove. Another great thing to do is if someone says "they researched" it themselves, most likely its total BS and at best its a 1/10 truth mixed with BS. Most news outlets only care about money, so if there is a story with validity they will all run it into the ground and try to get every penny out of it. Only watching/reading one or two places isnt good anymore,try as many as you can.
Whoa there buddy... Too. Much. Factual. Information. Your comment is sure to annoy some of the smooth brains around here. Just like every other corner of the internet... the painfully myopic and spectacularly ignorant preside here too.iamlurkerpro wrote: ↑Wed Aug 17, 2022 7:10 pmIn the Us 6 corporations do own over 90% of the media, thats why NPR and BBC are such great resources. NPR is kinda self funded(they dont get anything from the Gov) and BBC runs off a tax on cable in england and abroad, so they really are not beholden to corp boards. That does go back to the 6 are 100% in it for profit. If there was any( and I mean any) chance the Gov was lying about covid they would go balls out to squeeze every penny out of exposing them. Blackrock and vanguard are not in the 6 Corp's that own 90% of the media companies in the US. Also the "Dr's" you referred to articles were probably not peer reviewed and thats why they were discredited. Its like commercials for toothpaste where they say 9 out of 10 doctors recommend this, theres always some that go against the grain,but that doesnt mean they are correct. In science if 9 out of 10 say the peer reviewed info to be correct, then as close to 100% as you can get that the 1 is wrong.Roofdog wrote: ↑Wed Aug 17, 2022 4:13 pmThe funny thing is is that all of the major news we are fed....and yes they try to feed us the Bs, is all owned by 6 people who in turn are owned by either blackrock or vanguard (like everything else). I dont trust anything on any major tv networks. I think a lot of whats pumped out is meant to seperate us and cause divide. I read a lot of articles from accredited dr's, scientists, and people who were very esteemed by everyone until covid hit and they were discredited pretty quickly. We should be able to read both sides and make a decision for ourselves, but in this mess a lot of info was censored. That to me means there is something to hide. Again my opinion. Take care brother!iamlurkerpro wrote: ↑Wed Aug 17, 2022 3:21 pm A fairly large varity of places, NPR,BBC, Ny Times, and so many other's. I do not get any from Fox,facebook,youtube. It like in science, you hear a theory and read it, then find peer reviewed articles either proving or disproving. Like with Fox, almost 100% of their stories are only backed by the alex jones type outlet's, and most every other outlet in the world calls bs, so you can figure out the story is poo. Same goes with every outlet really, just fox being the worst, cnn has a story search for it and see if the other sources prove or disprove. Another great thing to do is if someone says "they researched" it themselves, most likely its total BS and at best its a 1/10 truth mixed with BS. Most news outlets only care about money, so if there is a story with validity they will all run it into the ground and try to get every penny out of it. Only watching/reading one or two places isnt good anymore,try as many as you can.
Roofdog wrote: ↑Tue Aug 16, 2022 9:54 amLook into Bill Gates and his father. They are straight up eugenisists. They dont hid it. And yes there is a much bigger agenda here. Its very slow moving but its moving. Thanks for you're post.CatfatherB wrote: ↑Sun Aug 14, 2022 11:02 amLook into the World Economic Forum and Klaus Schwab, agenda 2030. it's no secret, they openly state it. "You will own nothing and be happy". They're very much into "population control"IndelibleDotInk wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 9:40 pm or i dunno... am tired. Is a one world government such a bad thing? I guess if it entails mass killing, it does.
You arent kidding. If you look where the Gates family money goes into, its eveything in healthcare if you can call it that anymore. Look into south Africa and India where he has tested his vaccines. Horrible things have happened to those people.CatfatherB wrote: ↑Fri Aug 26, 2022 12:39 pmRoofdog wrote: ↑Tue Aug 16, 2022 9:54 amLook into Bill Gates and his father. They are straight up eugenisists. They dont hid it. And yes there is a much bigger agenda here. Its very slow moving but its moving. Thanks for you're post.CatfatherB wrote: ↑Sun Aug 14, 2022 11:02 am
Look into the World Economic Forum and Klaus Schwab, agenda 2030. it's no secret, they openly state it. "You will own nothing and be happy". They're very much into "population control"
https://anonymouswire.com/wef-declares- ... ty-of-you/
Yeah, they been publicly saying it openly for a long time now, they're not subtle about it anymore.