Implying Tulsi Gabbard is a "Russian" agent by saying you heard she was is basically like how some far right people in the media called Obama a Muslim. Did you believe that? Sounds ridiculous right? Both have no evidence whatsoever!
Tulsi Gabbard is an active sitting current member of Congress. She also is still serving in our nations Military with the rank of Major I believe. In November, she had to stop her President Campaign for two weeks to go due a training exercise for the Military, which again she is an active member of. Calling her a "Russian agent" is essentially implying she is a traitor. Are you seriously implying Gabbard, a congresswomen and current member of the military and running for President, is a "Russian" asset? Don't you think the Military would have, you know, had her arrested for Treason by now? That is what you are essentially implying (not putting words in your mouth, but saying you hear she is a Russian agent would make her a traitor if true). Imagine serving Congress, the military, and running for President, and being called a Russian Agent trying to interfere with the interests of the United States?
Meeting with the Syria President? Engaging in dialogue is worse than dropping bombs on a country? Just because the US says Assaud committed war crimes against his people,you believe that at face value? Remember how the US intelligence lied to the country to justify invading Iraq? Note, I do not know weather or not the President of Syria committed the crimes he is alleged of doing, but I keep an open mind and don't blindly believe whatever the media or our government says. Furthermore, Obama, Bush and other Past and the current President meet with the leaders of Saudi Arabia, which beheads women and engages in supplying terrorists groups with weapons (weapons they buy from the US), and Saudi Arabia is currently in a war in Yemen in which they are basically committing genocide on Yemin. "Parties to the conflict have exacerbated what the UN has called the world’s largest humanitarian catastrophe, including by unlawfully impeding delivery of desperately needed humanitarian aid." Source
https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2019/c ... ters/yemen Note how the US is
Helping Saudi Arabia by backing them in their war against Yemen. So I ask you: Did President Obama meet with war criminals in his visits to Saudi Arabia? You are okay with the US supplying aid to help Saudi Arabia kill innocent men, women, and children? How about US Presidents meeting with dictators like the President of China? Have you been following the Hong Kong protests? Or how China treats people of Muslim citizens? Read this,
https://time.com/5738401/xinjiang-uighu ... na-cables/ So was Obama when he meeting with with dictators and war criminals okay? Are these things the US should be allowing/helping/aiding? Was Obama a "puppet" to China or Saudi Arabia (or Clinton, who as Sec of State signed massive weapons deals to give weapons to Saudi Arabia, which our own government has admitted Saudi Arabia provides terrorists groups with weapons and funding)?
Meanwhile, if Gabbard were a "Russian" agent as you said you hear she is, why is she still serving in our military, our Congress, and still running for President? The United States Intelligence agencies hears and knows a lot more than us civilians. Furthermore, if there were ANY, ANY, shred of evidence she was indeed working to help a foreign government, why is our Government doing absolutely nothing about it? Is there any investigations on going about her being linked to helping Russia or any foreign government? The answer is no. Innocent until proven guilty is a fundamental aspect of our democracy, yet media outlets (which then turn to individuals who read said outlets) are implying Gabbard is a Russian Agent/Asset.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... g-paranoid From the linked article: "Vermont senator Bernie Sanders and South Bend’s mayor, Pete Buttigieg, suggested that Clinton ought to have had some evidence before implying something so outrageous about a Democratic elected official." Hearing Gabbard is a Russian agent is akin to hearing Obama is a Muslim from right wing republicans (a laughable claim, for both!)
Now, Tulsi Gabbard was actually a very high ranking member of the DNC in 2016. She was the vice-chairman behind wasserman schultz (who was then head of the DNC). So, Gabbard, just 4 years ago, was a rising star in the Democratic party, but yet now she's a Russian agent lol. She was basically second in charge of the DNC overseeing the 2016 democratic primary. She stepped down to endorse Sanders, because the DNC is supposed to be neutral. So she did the right thing (which hurt her political career) by stepping down. Guess what happened to the head of the DNC? Schultz resigned as head chairman of the DNC after evidence proved and revealed she meddled in the democratic primary to ensure Clinton became the nominee. The democrats interfered and meddled in their own election. "But it was typical Clinton. Paranoia about Russian influence has been ubiquitous among the Clinton set since 2016, in part because it helps to explain how the loss to Donald Trump wasn’t really Clinton’s fault. Liberals in the media like Rachel Maddow openly admit to having an obsession with Russia, and end up seeing the hands of Vladimir Putin on everything. Clinton herself has had trouble coming to terms with her loss. Even though accounts from inside the campaign confirm that Clinton barely knew why she was running for president, couldn’t craft any kind of message, and made laughably overconfident decisions about where to campaign, her campaign memoir was less a mea culpa than a j’accuse. It pointed fingers at Sanders and James Comey, and ended up sounding a lot like the Onion’s parody title: We All Made Mistakes But You Made Most Of Them."
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... g-paranoid
But yet the Democrats, the government, and our own military have not charged Gabbard with anything, they have not suggested any of these claims are true in the slightest, and they continue to allow Gabbard to serve in Congress, in the Military, and runs for the highest position in the world. Gabbard is also suing Clinton for making these baseless claims because of how such claims hurt her career and how she is viewed. It was Hilary Clinton who started this whole nonsense of implying Gabbard was working on behalf of the Russians or being helped by the Russians. Unlikely to succeed, the lawsuit is important because Clinton implying she is a Russian agent is not like you or even the media or regular citizens calling Gabbard that. Clinton had access to the highest levels of top secret information just a few years ago. For a person of such power, making such baseless claims can ruin a persons career and influence how that person is viewed. Now, even the media and Clinton have claimed Gabbard is a Russian asset, you will notice no official investigation or crime has be charged against her, as these claims of "Russian Agent" are complete and utterly false.
Here is Gabbard explaining why she is suing Clinton
https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status ... 7446150144
Here's is a Fox News video on the situation (note I hate Fox News, but I watch all and read all sides, independent news and mainstream news, to get a full view.). Gabbard answers these questions in this video. This video is on 3 minutes long, and she personally explains why calling her a Russian agent is basically calling her a traitor. Appearing on Fox news should not mean anything negative about Gabbard. After all, Bernie Sanders did a Town Hall on Fox News (which got many Republicans to agree with some of his views). And a President represents everybody, no matter the party, so those running for President SHOULD appear on all news stations.
https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status ... 92/video/1
You may not like Gabbard, as a person, as a politician, or for whatever reason. And that is fine. But implying she is a Traitor is in my opinion disrespectful to anyone who serves our country. My father was in the Navy and served in Vietnam. I am a Independent. I hate Trump, and I hated Clinton. I hated the way the democrats screwed Sanders over in 2016 and how their Supersaturate system makes their primary very very unfair (not to mention closed primaries which Independents can not vote for Democrat nominees). I am a support of Sanders, Yang, and Gabbard. I don't support parties, I support individuals. After all, basing voting decisions on parties is how we have gotten a us-vs-them divide that has gridlocked the government and makes it seem like we're not all on the same side (in the end,we're all Americans, all equal despite our views or differences).
This is not a bash or directly in a personal manner, so please I hope it does not come across lie that. I normally stay away from politics on this sub, but wanted to just add my thoughts here. If you or anyone does not like Tulsi Gabbard, no big deal, but as far as the Russian Agent false claim, I hope you at least hear what Gabbard has to say (in general, and on this whole Russian nonsense). And try and put yourself in Gabbard's position: A congresswomen and active military veteran and Presidential candidate who is being called a Traitor (which claiming she is working as a Russian agent implies). Is that fair to her? Is that an American thing to do, to make such claims against our elected officials and service members?
Just my thoughts, and I know this was a long post. I tried to make it clear and separate issues by paragraphs so its not a wall of text. And hopefully I added some context to this debate.
Peace
