Herba Rosa Kratom Review

[Sleepingonthebeach]

I was searching for a new vendor and came across Herba Rosa on another kratom forum. I like how they lab test their kratom. Green Maeng Da was on sale and I got a kilo for a fantastic price. My order was shipped very quickly and I was given plenty of email status updates. I got a tracking number for my order.

The kratom is very high quality and potent. I am looking forward to trying another strain when I place my next order.

[Herba Rosa]

I was searching for a new vendor and came across Herba Rosa on another kratom forum. I like how they lab test their kratom. Green Maeng Da was on sale and I got a kilo for a fantastic price. My order was shipped very quickly and I was given plenty of email status updates. I got a tracking number for my order.

The kratom is very high quality and potent. I am looking forward to trying another strain when I place my next order.

Thank you so much for this review! Very kind of you!

There are only 7 kilos of Green MD left and the local smoke shop always orders at least 3 or 4 every month,
so to you or anyone else reading this, be sure to get some while you still can!

It may no longer be on sale, but I do offer discounts to people who leave reviews.

Thanks again! So glad you enjoyed it

[Jaredsurf]

I can second herba rosa.great all around. Good product, service, and shipping. I like his approach to offereing just a couple batches. Not mixing them together and making a hundred different strains out of 3 batches. Amd no b.s. claims like his stuff is the most potent or better than everyone elses.The green md was s standout for me as well.

[Rhino236]

I can second herba rosa.great all around. Good product, service, and shipping. I like his approach to offereing just a couple batches. Not mixing them together and making a hundred different strains out of 3 batches. Amd no b.s. claims like his stuff is the most potent or better than everyone elses.The green md was s standout for me as well.

Exactly,I hate when companies import 2-3 kinds the blend them in different rations to make 30 different “strains”

[Jaredsurf]

I can second herba rosa.great all around. Good product, service, and shipping. I like his approach to offereing just a couple batches. Not mixing them together and making a hundred different strains out of 3 batches. Amd no b.s. claims like his stuff is the most potent or better than everyone elses.The green md was s standout for me as well.

Im refering to the mitra gaia type companies that literaly have every strain in every color. And no batch numbers. There are a couple smaller vendors that blend their own batches but are transparent and have incredible leaf. One of them is in my top 3 for sure. Some people just have fire leaf all around. My comment was made out of grief of wasting my money buying bulk crap...

[Herba Rosa]

I can second herba rosa.great all around. Good product, service, and shipping. I like his approach to offereing just a couple batches. Not mixing them together and making a hundred different strains out of 3 batches. Amd no b.s. claims like his stuff is the most potent or better than everyone elses.The green md was s standout for me as well.

Thank you so much, Jared! I'm feeling warm and fuzzy now

Very serendipitous. I've been imagining the day that Herba Rosa would be recognized!
It's surreal and I'm very happy.

Have a great weekend!

[Herba Rosa]

I can second herba rosa.great all around. Good product, service, and shipping. I like his approach to offereing just a couple batches. Not mixing them together and making a hundred different strains out of 3 batches. Amd no b.s. claims like his stuff is the most potent or better than everyone elses.The green md was s standout for me as well.

Im refering to the mitra gaia type companies that literaly have every strain in every color. And no batch numbers. There are a couple smaller vendors that blend their own batches but are transparent and have incredible leaf. One of them is in my top 3 for sure. Some people just have fire leaf all around. My comment was made out of grief of wasting my money buying bulk crap...

Great to know, Jared. I'll take that into account. I have batch numbers on all my kilos, but I just consider them all "Lot 1" unless it's a second round of the same strain.
Like, I'm getting a new batch of green maeng da soon and that's getting labeled with "(L2)". Otherwise, if they are new strains, I just put the name on the label with no number.
Do you think my labeling strategy should change to add batch numbers, from my supplier, to the label? Or are lot numbers sufficient for differentiating different batches?

Interested in hearing your thoughts on that, if I need to revise things.

[PistolsAtDawn]

I can second herba rosa.great all around. Good product, service, and shipping. I like his approach to offereing just a couple batches. Not mixing them together and making a hundred different strains out of 3 batches. Amd no b.s. claims like his stuff is the most potent or better than everyone elses.The green md was s standout for me as well.

Im refering to the mitra gaia type companies that literaly have every strain in every color. And no batch numbers. There are a couple smaller vendors that blend their own batches but are transparent and have incredible leaf. One of them is in my top 3 for sure. Some people just have fire leaf all around. My comment was made out of grief of wasting my money buying bulk crap...

Great to know, Jared. I'll take that into account. I have batch numbers on all my kilos, but I just consider them all "Lot 1" unless it's a second round of the same strain.
Like, I'm getting a new batch of green maeng da soon and that's getting labeled with "(L2)". Otherwise, if they are new strains, I just put the name on the label with no number.
Do you think my labeling strategy should change to add batch numbers, from my supplier, to the label? Or are lot numbers sufficient for differentiating different batches?

Interested in hearing your thoughts on that, if I need to revise things.

I think in absence of having alkaloid percentages listed (which I know is not the norm), I'm more inclined to order when there's a way for me to be sure I can reorder any batch that worked really well for me.

Now, that's not always necessary either. If the supplier remains the same and the vendor's mixes keep the same ratios, then that's totally fine too. But you may have to answer an email from me inquiring about that in absence of lab reports.

Ultimately, I wouldn't say not doing this harms your sales or make me assume anything negative about your product. So I guess you have to weigh what the extra work and expense would mean to your business against a nearly-impossible-to-measure benefit.

Vendors such as yourself who have good reputations here are enough for me, but I really do appreciate the lab analysis or alkaloid percentages being available since I use kratom medicinally.

[Rhino236]

I can second herba rosa.great all around. Good product, service, and shipping. I like his approach to offereing just a couple batches. Not mixing them together and making a hundred different strains out of 3 batches. Amd no b.s. claims like his stuff is the most potent or better than everyone elses.The green md was s standout for me as well.

Im refering to the mitra gaia type companies that literaly have every strain in every color. And no batch numbers. There are a couple smaller vendors that blend their own batches but are transparent and have incredible leaf. One of them is in my top 3 for sure. Some people just have fire leaf all around. My comment was made out of grief of wasting my money buying bulk crap...

Great to know, Jared. I'll take that into account. I have batch numbers on all my kilos, but I just consider them all "Lot 1" unless it's a second round of the same strain.
Like, I'm getting a new batch of green maeng da soon and that's getting labeled with "(L2)". Otherwise, if they are new strains, I just put the name on the label with no number.
Do you think my labeling strategy should change to add batch numbers, from my supplier, to the label? Or are lot numbers sufficient for differentiating different batches?

Interested in hearing your thoughts on that, if I need to revise things.

What most vendors do including myself is put date of release along with a supplier code. So when I get a batch in I’ll label it 092621D last letter correlates with the supplier it is. Customers seem to like it so they can reorder the same batch.

[PistolsAtDawn]

What most vendors do including myself is put date of release along with a supplier code. So when I get a batch in I’ll label it 092621D last letter correlates with the supplier it is. Customers seem to like it so they can reorder the same batch.

I'm having a nice, slow burn from your Red Jungle right now. It's a bit of a creeper with long legs. My favorite kind! Knowing I can reorder the same batch does encourage me to do exactly that.

[Herba Rosa]

Im refering to the mitra gaia type companies that literaly have every strain in every color. And no batch numbers. There are a couple smaller vendors that blend their own batches but are transparent and have incredible leaf. One of them is in my top 3 for sure. Some people just have fire leaf all around. My comment was made out of grief of wasting my money buying bulk crap...

Great to know, Jared. I'll take that into account. I have batch numbers on all my kilos, but I just consider them all "Lot 1" unless it's a second round of the same strain.
Like, I'm getting a new batch of green maeng da soon and that's getting labeled with "(L2)". Otherwise, if they are new strains, I just put the name on the label with no number.
Do you think my labeling strategy should change to add batch numbers, from my supplier, to the label? Or are lot numbers sufficient for differentiating different batches?

Interested in hearing your thoughts on that, if I need to revise things.

I think in absence of having alkaloid percentages listed (which I know is not the norm), I'm more inclined to order when there's a way for me to be sure I can reorder any batch that worked really well for me.

Now, that's not always necessary either. If the supplier remains the same and the vendor's mixes keep the same ratios, then that's totally fine too. But you may have to answer an email from me inquiring about that in absence of lab reports.

Ultimately, I wouldn't say not doing this harms your sales or make me assume anything negative about your product. So I guess you have to weigh what the extra work and expense would mean to your business against a nearly-impossible-to-measure benefit.

Vendors such as yourself who have good reputations here are enough for me, but I really do appreciate the lab analysis or alkaloid percentages being available since I use kratom medicinally.

Gotcha! Well, I do include Alkaloid percentages on the label, but haven't added them to the product listing pages on my website. Maybe I should. Also, I have the test results, but I'm working on a safe/secure way for people to access them on my website. For now, it's something I can send to people over email.

[Herba Rosa]

Im refering to the mitra gaia type companies that literaly have every strain in every color. And no batch numbers. There are a couple smaller vendors that blend their own batches but are transparent and have incredible leaf. One of them is in my top 3 for sure. Some people just have fire leaf all around. My comment was made out of grief of wasting my money buying bulk crap...

Great to know, Jared. I'll take that into account. I have batch numbers on all my kilos, but I just consider them all "Lot 1" unless it's a second round of the same strain.
Like, I'm getting a new batch of green maeng da soon and that's getting labeled with "(L2)". Otherwise, if they are new strains, I just put the name on the label with no number.
Do you think my labeling strategy should change to add batch numbers, from my supplier, to the label? Or are lot numbers sufficient for differentiating different batches?

Interested in hearing your thoughts on that, if I need to revise things.

What most vendors do including myself is put date of release along with a supplier code. So when I get a batch in I’ll label it 092621D last letter correlates with the supplier it is. Customers seem to like it so they can reorder the same batch.

Thanks for the advice! I'll start doing that ASAP. Does it go on your label, your product page, or both?

[KCobbBMore]

Personally, I like the date/batch and the source. If something works well for (or not) I know if I should get more (or not)

[Rhino236]

Great to know, Jared. I'll take that into account. I have batch numbers on all my kilos, but I just consider them all "Lot 1" unless it's a second round of the same strain.
Like, I'm getting a new batch of green maeng da soon and that's getting labeled with "(L2)". Otherwise, if they are new strains, I just put the name on the label with no number.
Do you think my labeling strategy should change to add batch numbers, from my supplier, to the label? Or are lot numbers sufficient for differentiating different batches?

Interested in hearing your thoughts on that, if I need to revise things.

What most vendors do including myself is put date of release along with a supplier code. So when I get a batch in I’ll label it 092621D last letter correlates with the supplier it is. Customers seem to like it so they can reorder the same batch.

Thanks for the advice! I'll start doing that ASAP. Does it go on your label, your product page, or both?

I do both the label and product page.

[Herba Rosa]

What most vendors do including myself is put date of release along with a supplier code. So when I get a batch in I’ll label it 092621D last letter correlates with the supplier it is. Customers seem to like it so they can reorder the same batch.

Thanks for the advice! I'll start doing that ASAP. Does it go on your label, your product page, or both?

I do both the label and product page.

Thanks for the feedback! I'll add it ASAP.